Thursday, June 9, 2011

RIRS: Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery ensures complete clearance of renal stone


In this case stenting and ESWL had left one residual fragment in the renal pelvis.



OUR RIRS URETEROSCOPE
In our hospitals;we routinely prestent the patient during ESWL. The reasons being two; one that stenting facilitates the passage of calculus fragments and at the same time safeguards kidney from any obstructive complications. Secondly in the event if the ESWL fails then RIRS during the stent removal can ensure complete clearance.RIRS in presented patient is comparatively easier task as the ureter is dilated and placement of ureteric access sheath becomes easier task.
Review of literature:
In RIRS; a fibre-optic tube is inserted through the urethral meatus into the kidney after passing it through bladder and the ureter. The stone is visualized and is thereafter evaporated by a laser probe. We have a 20 W Holmium LASER(Sphinx). The procedure is usually done under general or spinal anesthesia. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) allows the surgeon to do surgery inside the kidney without making an incision/ and hole on the body.
The indications for RIRS include:
· Failed previous treatment attempts of ESWL
· Strictures
· Tumors
· Stones in children
· Patients with bleeding disorders
· Patients with gross obesity/KYPHOSCOLIOSIS etc

We combine the two modalities of ESWL and RIRS routinely in all patients and give 100% success rate after the procedure for all patients. The combination of these modalities ensure elimination of the need for more invasive procedures like PCNL.This is a special boon for patients having physical deformities like obesity or kyphosis.

palliative radical nephrectomy:Metastatic Renal cell Carcinoma













A 75-year-old gentleman came to us after he was diagnosed to be having left renal mass.He initially had back pain for which he consulted spine surgeon.After initial conservative therapy failed;he was subjected to MRI spine.MRI revealed metastatic foci in dorsolumbar vertebrae.

His staging work up revealed enhancing midpolar mass in left kidney.The mass appeared to be confined to the kidney only although there was ipsilateral psoas thickening.It also revealed basal metastatic lung lesions.We came to conclusion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

As the patient had a good performance index and preserved biochemical and hematological parameters he was advised palliative nephrectomy.

The open radical nephrectomy was performed ; the post-operative course was uneventful.The final Histopathology read as Renal cell Carcinoma -Furhmann Grade 3 with T3 stage.

He is planned for Sunitinib therapy.(Sutent 50 mg cap/day ) along with possible radiation to the spine if needed.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

Renal cell carcimoma (RCC) is the third most common genitourinary cancer after prostate and bladder. Majority (80% to 85%) of kidney tumors are malignant. It is the most lethal malignancy of all urological cancers.Unique characteristics of RCC lack of early warning signs,§ diverse clinical§ manifestations, resistance to radiation and chemotherapy, and immunogenic nature and spontaneous regressions.

Pretreatment features associated with shorter survival

There are various studies identifying the pretreatment factors associated with poor survival. These are – Low Karnofsky performance status (< 80%)– High lactate dehydrogenase level (> 1.5 x normal)– Low hemoglobin level– High serum calcium– Absence of nephrectomy• Nephrectomy and resection of metastases has been reported to prolong the survival. Effect is enhanced with long disease-free interval between initial nephrectomy and development of metastases.

Survival also depends on the site of metastasis. Patients with lung metastasis only have better survival than those with other site metastasis. (Flanigan RC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1655-1659.)

Available treatment modalitiesOptions for chemotherapy and endocrine-based approaches are limited, and no hormonal or chemotherapeutic regimen is accepted as a standard of care. Therefore, various biologic therapies have been evaluated. New agents, such as sorafenib and sunitinib, having anti-angiogenic effects through targeting multiple receptor kinases, and have been investigated in patients failing immunotherapy.

Role of Surgery Palliative nephrectomy should be considered in patients with metastatic disease for alleviation of symptoms such as pain, hemorrhage, malaise. Several randomized studies are now showing improved overall survival in patients presenting with metastatic kidney cancer who have nephrectomy followed by either interferon or IL-2. If the patient has good physiological status, then nephrectomy should be performed prior to immunotherapy. There are anecdotal reports documenting regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after removal of the primary tumor but adjuvant nephrectomy is not recommended for inducing spontaneous regression; rather, it is performed to decrease symptoms or to decrease tumor burden for subsequent therapy in carefully controlled environments. About 25-30% of patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis, and fewer than 5% have solitary metastasis. Surgical resection is recommended in selected patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. This procedure may not be curative in all patients but may produce some long-term survivors. The possibility of disease-free survival increases after resection of primary tumor and isolated metastasis excision.

RADIATION THERAPY:Radiation therapy may be considered as the primary therapy for palliation in patients whose clinical condition precludes surgery, either because of extensive disease or poor overall condition. A dose of 4500 centigray (cGy) is delivered, with consideration of a boost up to 5500 cGy. Preoperative radiation therapy has not been found to yield any survival advantage. Controversies exist concerning postoperative radiation therapy, but it may be considered in patients with peri-nephric fat extension, adrenal invasion, or involved margins. A dose of 4500 cGy is delivered, with consideration of a boost. Palliative radiation therapy often is used for local or symptomatic metastatic disease, such as painful osseous lesions or brain metastasis, to halt potential neurological progression. Surgery also should be considered for solitary brain or spine lesions, followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery is more effective than surgical extirpation for local control and can be performed on multiple lesions.

Multi-kinase inhibitors:

Sunitinib (Sutent) Sunitinib is another multi-kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA in January 2006 for the treatment of metastatic kidney cancer that has progressed after a trial of immunotherapy. The approval was based on the high response rate (40% partial responses) and a median time to progression of 8.7 months and an overall survival of 16.4 months. The receptor .b and atyrosine kinases inhibited by sunitinib include VEGFR 1-3 and PDGFR Major toxicities (grade II or higher) include fatigue (38%), diarrhea (24%), nausea (19%), dyspepsia (16%), stomatitis (19%), and decline in cardiac ejection fraction (11%). Dermatitis occurred in 8%, and hypertension occurred in 5% of patients. A recent phase 3 study evaluating sunitinib in the first-line setting, , in patients with metastatic RCC demonstrated significantacompared against IFN- improvement in PFS and response rates compared against the control arm. These results are considered to be preliminary, and longer-term follow-up is necessary for conclusive results.Other multi-kinase inhibitors undergoing investigation for RCC Lapatinib is an EGFR and ErbB-2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which appears to have efficacy in the treatment of tumors, including RCC, which overexpress EGFR. This was recently reported in a phase 3 study in advanced RCC evaluating lapatinib against hormonal therapy in patients who had failed prior therapy.RAD001 (Everolimus) is a serine-threonine kinase inhibitor of mTOR, an important regulatory protein in cell signaling. A recent phase 2 trial in patients with metastatic RCC demonstrated promising preliminary clinical results

Thursday, June 2, 2011

MATHIEU REPAIR FOR HYPOSPADIAS CRIPPLE


LOUPE ASSISTED HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR

We did Mathieu repair for hypospadias cripple who had undergone four repairs for proximal hypospadias.As the local flaps on the dorsum(TPIF) and lateral based flap were unavailable the permeatal flap was raised and the repair was done satisfactorily.

Gross prostatomegaly with seminal vesicle hematoma presenting as acute retention of urine



MORCELLATED PROSTATIC CHIPS


MRI SHOWING PROSTATOMEGALY WITH GROSS SEMINAL VESICLE DILATATION WITH MASS WITHIN


A 65 year old gentleman came with acute retention of urine.He was catheterised with 18 Fr Foleys catheter; around 1.2 litres of urine drained out.His imaging showed gross prostatomegaly with seminal vesicle dilatation and mass in the seminal vesicle.He further underwent MRI pelvis which demonstrated prostatomegaly with seminal vesicular cyst and hematoma/mass inside.His PSA value was normal and his previous TURPs(he underwent two TURPswithin a span of 2 years for acute retention of urine).The Histopathological analysis showed benign prostatomegaly only.He was taken up for laser prostatectomy and was planned for review imaging after 3 weks for seminal vesicular hematoma/mass.The catheter was removed on second day post-operatively and he passed urine in good stream with low residual urine volume.His histopathological analysis was again benign.In the post-operative period he presented with seconary bleeding on 7 Th day; so was taken up for cystoscopy and clot evacuation.There was organised clot in the prostatic fossa measuring around 6X6 cm.The mass had to be morcellated with the morcellator.After the procedure he was comfortable with clear urine.He was given catheter free trial two days later and passed urine freely.Review Imaging showed no seminal vesicular mass/dilatation.The prostatic mass was probably decompressed seminal vesicular hematoma which probably would have resulted in resolution of seminal vesicular dilatation.

LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR EXOPHYTIC MIDPOLAR RENAL MASSA












A 70-year old gentleman came with incidentally detected right renal mass( on USG scan done for urinary retention).He was investigated with staging work up including triphasic CT Scan which revealed enhancing mass around 5 cm in midpolar region with both exophytic and endophytic component.



After explaining to the patient the options of both laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy he opted for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.



Laparoscopic surgery was done with 5 port approach and the specimen was removed by a small right iliac fossa incision.